781 total citations 42 papers, 463 citations indexed
About
Dinah Eastop is a scholar working on Archeology, Conservation and Museology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Dinah Eastop has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 463 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Archeology, 15 papers in Conservation and 9 papers in Museology. Recurrent topics in Dinah Eastop's work include Conservation Techniques and Studies (15 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (12 papers) and 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (8 papers). Dinah Eastop is often cited by papers focused on Conservation Techniques and Studies (15 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (12 papers) and 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (8 papers). Dinah Eastop collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Dinah Eastop's co-authors include Mary W. Ballard, J.M. Dulieu‐Barton, A.R. Chambers, Nobuko Shibayama, D. J. Webb, Gang‐Ding Peng, Melin Şahin, Chao Zhang, Kathryn Gill and Caroline T. Clark and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Studies in Conservation and Strain.
In The Last Decade
Dinah Eastop
38 papers
receiving
384 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Dinah Eastop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dinah Eastop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dinah Eastop more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dinah Eastop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dinah Eastop. The network helps show where Dinah Eastop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dinah Eastop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dinah Eastop.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dinah Eastop based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dinah Eastop. Dinah Eastop is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Eastop, Dinah, et al.. (2011). Changing views of textile conservation.6 indexed citations
3.
Eastop, Dinah, et al.. (2009). Application of digital image correlation to tapestry and textile condition assessment. 123(3). 207–8.1 indexed citations
Dulieu‐Barton, J.M., et al.. (2008). Application of digitial image correlation to deformation measurements in textiles. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
6.
Eastop, Dinah. (2007). Sound recording and text creation: oral history and the Deliberately Concealed Garments Project. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
Eastop, Dinah. (2003). The biography of objects: a tool for analysing an object's significance. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
12.
Eastop, Dinah, et al.. (2003). Secret agents: deliberately concealed garments as symbolic textiles. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).4 indexed citations
13.
Eastop, Dinah. (2003). Conservation as a democratising practice: learning from Latin America. Review of the Museum Forum held at the Triennial Meeting of the Conservation Committee of ICOM (International Council for Museums) in Rio de Janeiro. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.