Studies in Musical Theatre

215 papers and 235 indexed citations i.

About

The 215 papers published in Studies in Musical Theatre in the last decades have received a total of 235 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Musical Theatre usually cover Music (182 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (93 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (58 papers) specifically the topics of Theater, Performance, and Music History (148 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (89 papers) and Music History and Culture (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Musical Theatre are Stacy Wolf, David Roesner, Trevor Boffone, Hyewon Kim, Craig M. McGill, Carol J. Oja, R. K. Shah, Raymond Knapp, Virginia Anderson and D. R. Miller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Musical Theatre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Musical Theatre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Musical Theatre.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Musical Theatre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Musical Theatre. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Musical Theatre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Musical Theatre more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025