Renascence

463 papers and 437 indexed citations

About

The 463 papers published in Renascence in the last decades have received a total of 437 indexed citations. Papers published in Renascence usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (105 papers), History (47 papers) and Philosophy (41 papers) specifically the topics of American and British Literature Analysis (18 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (17 papers) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Renascence are Thomas Schaub, Anton Lang, John Coates, Vincent J. Cheng, Elizabeth Teresa Howe, Wesley Trimpi, Kathleen Wright, Dorothy A. Winsor, Kurt F. Reinhardt and Thomas L. Martin.

In The Last Decade

Renascence

63 papers receiving 143 citations

Fields of papers published in Renascence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Renascence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Renascence.

Countries where authors publish in Renascence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Renascence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Renascence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renascence more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026