Frühmittelalterliche Studien

504 papers and 672 indexed citations i.

About

The 504 papers published in Frühmittelalterliche Studien in the last decades have received a total of 672 indexed citations. Papers published in Frühmittelalterliche Studien usually cover Classics (237 papers), History (212 papers) and Archeology (104 papers) specifically the topics of Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (180 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (108 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frühmittelalterliche Studien are Gerd Althoff, Hagen Keller, Otto Gerhard Oexle, Robert Deshman, Wendy Davies, Arnold Angenendt, Rüdiger Schnell, Heinz Meyer, Karl Schmid and David M. Wilson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frühmittelalterliche Studien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frühmittelalterliche Studien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frühmittelalterliche Studien.

Countries where authors publish in Frühmittelalterliche Studien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frühmittelalterliche Studien. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frühmittelalterliche Studien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frühmittelalterliche Studien more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025