Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Claus Offe Claus Offe (= 1×)
peers
Frances Fox Piven
Countries citing papers authored by Claus Offe
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Claus Offe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claus Offe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claus Offe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claus Offe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claus Offe. The network helps show where Claus Offe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claus Offe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claus Offe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claus Offe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Claus Offe. Claus Offe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Offe, Claus. (2012). Governance − "puste pojęcie" czy naukowy program badawczy?. 87–102.2 indexed citations
2.
Hartmann, Martin & Claus Offe. (2011). Politische Theorie und politische Philosophie : ein Handbuch. C.H.Beck eBooks.1 indexed citations
3.
Vanderborght, Yannick, et al.. (2005). Ein Grundeinkommen für alle? : Geschichte und Zukunft eines radikalen Vorschlags. Campus eBooks.6 indexed citations
4.
Hinrichs, Karl, et al.. (2003). Arbeitszeitsituation und Arbeitszeitverkürzung in der Sicht der Beschäftigten: Ergebnisse einer Arbeitnehmerbefragung. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. 16(2). 91–105.1 indexed citations
5.
Offe, Claus. (2003). Herausforderungen der Demokratie : zur Integrations- und Leistungsfähigkeit politischer Institutionen. Campus Verlag eBooks.13 indexed citations
6.
Heinze, Rolf G., et al.. (2003). Arbeitszeitflexibilisierung als Beschäftigungspolitisches Instrument - Wirkungen und Grenzen Neuer Arbeitszeitpolitik. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. 12(3). 276–288.1 indexed citations
7.
Kitschelt, Herbert, et al.. (2000). Kontingenz und Krise : institutionenpolitik in kapitalistischen und postsozialistischen gesellschaften. Campus Verlag eBooks.21 indexed citations
8.
Offe, Claus. (2000). The democratic welfare state: a European regime under the strain of European integration. Institutional Repository (IHS Vienna). 68. 28.6 indexed citations
Offe, Claus, et al.. (1983). Arbeitszeitpolitik : Formen und Folgen einer Neuverteilung der Arbeitszeit. Campus eBooks.4 indexed citations
18.
Heinze, Rolf G. & Claus Offe. (1981). Verbändepolitik und "Neokorporatismus". Westdeutscher Verlag eBooks.2 indexed citations
19.
Offe, Claus, et al.. (1977). Opfer des Arbeitsmarktes : zur Theorie der strukturierten Arbeitslosigkeit. Luchterhand eBooks.12 indexed citations
20.
Offe, Claus. (1975). Berufsbildungsreform : eine Fallstudie über Reformpolitik. Suhrkamp eBooks.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.