Studies About Languages

227 papers and 733 indexed citations

About

The 227 papers published in Studies About Languages in the last decades have received a total of 733 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies About Languages usually cover Language and Linguistics (156 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (55 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (45 papers) specifically the topics of linguistics and terminology studies (48 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (43 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies About Languages are Vida Škudienė, Yves Gambier, Alireza Jalilifar, Francesca Costa, Yang Ping, Nicola Daly, Terry Locke, Christian Jones, Masood Khoshsaligheh and Saeed Ketabi.

In The Last Decade

Studies About Languages

148 papers receiving 606 citations

Countries where authors publish in Studies About Languages

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies About Languages. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies About Languages with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies About Languages more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Studies About Languages

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies About Languages. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies About Languages.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026