Countries where authors publish in Foundations of Physics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Foundations of Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Foundations of Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foundations of Physics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Foundations of Physics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Foundations of Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Foundations of Physics.
About Foundations of Physics
The 3.3k papers published in Foundations of Physics in the last decades have received a total of 35.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Foundations of Physics usually cover Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.2k papers), History and Philosophy of Science (359 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.2k papers) specifically the topics of Quantum Mechanics and Applications (1.8k papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (610 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (557 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (496 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (475 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (348 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (337 papers) and Biofield Effects and Biophysics (328 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Foundations of Physics are Richard P. Feynman, H. D. Zeh, David J. Foulis, Sandu Popescu, Daniel Rohrlich, M. K. Bennett, Asher Peres, David Hestenes, William K. Wootters and James Park.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.