Sport Marketing Quarterly

715 papers and 15.2k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 715 papers published in Sport Marketing Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 15.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Sport Marketing Quarterly usually cover Gender Studies (378 papers), Sociology and Political Science (350 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (205 papers) specifically the topics of Sports, Gender, and Society (354 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (242 papers) and Sports Analytics and Performance (203 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sport Marketing Quarterly are Galen T. Trail, Daniel C. Funk, Janet Fink, Dean F. Anderson, Donna L. Pastore, Gregg Bennett, Daniel F. Mahony, Stephen Ross, George R. Milne and Ketra L. Armstrong.

In The Last Decade

Sport Marketing Quarterly

517 papers receiving 9.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Sport Marketing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sport Marketing Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sport Marketing Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Sport Marketing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sport Marketing Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sport Marketing Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sport Marketing Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026