Skin Research and Technology

2.3k papers and 38.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Skin Research and Technology in the last decades have received a total of 38.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Skin Research and Technology usually cover Dermatology (1.4k papers), Pharmaceutical Science (494 papers) and Cell Biology (311 papers) specifically the topics of Skin Protection and Aging (628 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (494 papers) and Dermatology and Skin Diseases (406 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Skin Research and Technology are Julia Welzel, Enzo Berardesca, Jørgen Serup, Howard I. Maïbach, Howard I. Maibach, Frederick H. Silver, Hristo Dobrev, Jeanette M. Waller, William V. Stoecker and Jean‐Michel Lagarde.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Skin Research and Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Skin Research and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Skin Research and Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Skin Research and Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Skin Research and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Skin Research and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Skin Research and Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025