M. Emre Celebi

12.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
159 papers, 7.4k citations indexed

About

M. Emre Celebi is a scholar working on Oncology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Emre Celebi has authored 159 papers receiving a total of 7.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 84 papers in Oncology, 60 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 57 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in M. Emre Celebi's work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (83 papers), AI in cancer detection (46 papers) and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (31 papers). M. Emre Celebi is often cited by papers focused on Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (83 papers), AI in cancer detection (46 papers) and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (31 papers). M. Emre Celebi collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. M. Emre Celebi's co-authors include Hitoshi Iyatomi, Hassan A. Kingravi, Gerald Schaefer, Patricio A. Vela, William V. Stoecker, Catarina Barata, Y. Alp Aslandogan, Jorge S. Marques, Qaisar Abbas and Irene Fondón and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Expert Systems with Applications and IEEE Access.

In The Last Decade

M. Emre Celebi

157 papers receiving 7.1k citations

Hit Papers

A comparative study of efficient initialization methods f... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Emre Celebi United States 44 4.4k 3.9k 1.8k 1.2k 1.1k 159 7.4k
Muhammad Attique Khan Pakistan 64 2.0k 0.5× 4.5k 1.2× 4.3k 2.3× 1.2k 1.1× 836 0.8× 314 12.3k
Gerald Schaefer United Kingdom 31 1.4k 0.3× 2.0k 0.5× 2.6k 1.4× 428 0.4× 439 0.4× 306 5.4k
Muhammad Sharif Pakistan 49 1.0k 0.2× 2.4k 0.6× 2.9k 1.6× 496 0.4× 442 0.4× 137 7.2k
Tanzila Saba Saudi Arabia 67 1.1k 0.3× 5.3k 1.3× 6.1k 3.3× 1.0k 0.9× 462 0.4× 417 14.4k
Amjad Rehman Saudi Arabia 57 838 0.2× 4.2k 1.1× 5.1k 2.8× 798 0.7× 348 0.3× 397 11.6k
Anne Lynn S. Chang United States 48 2.3k 0.5× 1.6k 0.4× 3.4k 1.8× 170 0.1× 2.3k 2.1× 220 12.5k
Ilias Maglogiannis Greece 32 475 0.1× 1.2k 0.3× 1.2k 0.6× 653 0.6× 130 0.1× 263 4.3k
Hassan A. Kingravi United States 12 753 0.2× 1.0k 0.3× 348 0.2× 242 0.2× 197 0.2× 26 1.9k
Li Zhang China 45 419 0.1× 2.4k 0.6× 2.4k 1.3× 584 0.5× 127 0.1× 389 7.1k
Jinman Kim Australia 36 482 0.1× 1.6k 0.4× 1.6k 0.9× 532 0.5× 315 0.3× 251 4.8k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Emre Celebi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Emre Celebi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Emre Celebi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Emre Celebi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Emre Celebi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Emre Celebi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Emre Celebi. The network helps show where M. Emre Celebi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Emre Celebi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Emre Celebi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Emre Celebi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Emre Celebi. M. Emre Celebi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhu, Yijie, Ahmed Bouridane, M. Emre Celebi, et al.. (2024). Quantum Face Recognition With Multigate Quantum Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence. 5(12). 6330–6341. 7 indexed citations
2.
Mirikharaji, Zahra, Kumar Abhishek, Alceu Bissoto, et al.. (2023). A survey on deep learning for skin lesion segmentation. Medical Image Analysis. 88. 102863–102863. 90 indexed citations
3.
Celebi, M. Emre, et al.. (2023). cq100: a high-quality image dataset for color quantization research. Journal of Electronic Imaging. 32(3). 2 indexed citations
4.
Shah, Asghar Ali, et al.. (2023). An ensemble-based deep learning model for detection of mutation causing cutaneous melanoma. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 22251–22251. 3 indexed citations
5.
Celebi, M. Emre, et al.. (2016). Raptor and visual logic©: a comparison of flowcharting tools for CS0. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 31(4). 36–41. 1 indexed citations
6.
Celebi, M. Emre, et al.. (2014). Histogram-Based Method for Effective Initialization of the K-Means Clustering Algorithm. The Florida AI Research Society. 4 indexed citations
7.
Abbas, Qaisar, et al.. (2013). Features preserving contrast improvement for retinal vascular images. International journal of innovative computing, information & control. 9(9). 3731–3739. 2 indexed citations
8.
Celebi, M. Emre, et al.. (2013). An Accelerated Nearest Neighbor Search Method for the K-Means Clustering Algorithm. The Florida AI Research Society. 5 indexed citations
9.
Celebi, M. Emre, et al.. (2013). A Simulated Annealing Clustering Algorithm Based On Center Perturbation Using Gaussian Mutation. The Florida AI Research Society. 8 indexed citations
10.
Celebi, M. Emre, et al.. (2012). Investigation of Internal Validity Measures for K-Means Clustering. Lecture notes in computer science. 2195(1). 471–476. 38 indexed citations
11.
Abbas, Qaisar, M. Emre Celebi, Irene Fondón, & Muhammad Rashid. (2011). Lesion border detection in dermoscopy images using dynamic programming. Skin Research and Technology. 17(1). 91–100. 67 indexed citations
12.
Hwang, Sae & M. Emre Celebi. (2010). Polyp detection in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy videos based on image segmentation and geometric feature. 678–681. 52 indexed citations
13.
Hwang, Sae & M. Emre Celebi. (2010). Texture Segmentation of Dermoscopy Images using Gabor Filters and G-Means Clustering.. IPCV. 882–886. 9 indexed citations
14.
Wang, Hanzheng, Randy H. Moss, Xiaohe Chen, et al.. (2010). Modified watershed technique and post-processing for segmentation of skin lesions in dermoscopy images. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 35(2). 116–120. 46 indexed citations
15.
Stoecker, William V., Kapil Gupta, Raeed H. Chowdhury, et al.. (2009). Detection of basal cell carcinoma using color and histogram measures of semitranslucent areas. Skin Research and Technology. 15(3). 283–287. 20 indexed citations
16.
Celebi, M. Emre. (2009). An Effective Color Quantization Method Based on the Competitive Learning Paradigm.. IPCV. 876–880. 24 indexed citations
17.
Celebi, M. Emre, et al.. (2008). Python puts a squeeze on java for CS0 and beyond. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 23(6). 49–57. 12 indexed citations
18.
Celebi, M. Emre, Hassan A. Kingravi, Hitoshi Iyatomi, et al.. (2007). A methodological approach to the classification of dermoscopy images. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 31(6). 362–373. 480 indexed citations
19.
Celebi, M. Emre & Y. Alp Aslandogan. (2005). Human Perception-Driven, Similarity-Based Access to Image Databases. The Florida AI Research Society. 245–250. 4 indexed citations
20.
Celebi, M. Emre, et al.. (2005). Skin Lesion Segmentation Using Clustering Techniques. The Florida AI Research Society. 364–369. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026