Skeletal Muscle

435 papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 435 papers published in Skeletal Muscle in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Skeletal Muscle usually cover Molecular Biology (395 papers), Physiology (120 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (68 papers) specifically the topics of Muscle Physiology and Disorders (331 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (69 papers) and Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Skeletal Muscle are Stefano Schiaffino, Cristina Mammucari, Pura Muñoz‐Cánoves, Leslie A. Leinwand, Patrizia Pessina, Antonio L. Serrano, Joe N. Kornegay, Tyesha N. Burks, Ronald D. Cohn and Elisabeth R. Barton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Skeletal Muscle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Skeletal Muscle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Skeletal Muscle.

Countries where authors publish in Skeletal Muscle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Skeletal Muscle. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Skeletal Muscle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Skeletal Muscle more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025