This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Separations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Separations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Separations more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Separations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Separations.
About Separations
The 2.0k papers published in Separations in the last decades have received a total of 15.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Separations usually cover Analytical Chemistry (413 papers), Biochemistry (157 papers), Water Science and Technology (284 papers), Spectroscopy (333 papers) and Food Science (354 papers) specifically the topics of Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (271 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (194 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (160 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (151 papers), Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (129 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (125 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (98 papers) and Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Separations are Abuzar Kabir, Victoria Samanidou, Małgorzata Starowicz, Marcello Locatelli, Kenneth G. Furton, Verónica Pino, George A. Zachariadis, Mahmoud M. Elewa, Yizhak Marcus and Rajmund Michalski.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.