Countries where authors publish in Comptes Rendus Chimie
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comptes Rendus Chimie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comptes Rendus Chimie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comptes Rendus Chimie more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Comptes Rendus Chimie
This network shows the impact of papers published in Comptes Rendus Chimie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comptes Rendus Chimie.
About Comptes Rendus Chimie
The 2.9k papers published in Comptes Rendus Chimie in the last decades have received a total of 55.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Comptes Rendus Chimie usually cover Inorganic Chemistry (577 papers), Organic Chemistry (1.1k papers) and Catalysis (198 papers) specifically the topics of Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (175 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (165 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (160 papers), Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles (158 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (158 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (136 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (118 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comptes Rendus Chimie are Akira Fujishima, Xintong Zhang, Fabrice Odobel, Yann Pellegrin, Hans J. Schäfer, Georgiy B. Shul’pin⊗, Daniel Mansuy, Setsuhisa Tanabe, J. R. White and Michaël Grätzel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.