Brain Research Bulletin

10.2k papers and 294.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.2k papers published in Brain Research Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 294.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Brain Research Bulletin usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (4.8k papers), Molecular Biology (2.8k papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (2.2k papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2.6k papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (963 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (936 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Research Bulletin are Larry W. Swanson, Larry L. Butcher, Nancy J. Woolf, Robert S. Sloviter, Theodore A. Slotkin, Trond Peder Flaten, James W. Fawcett, Frederic J. Seidler, Michael T. Shipley and David M. Jacobowitz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Brain Research Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Research Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Research Bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in Brain Research Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Research Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Research Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Research Bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025