Heart Rhythm

6.9k papers and 165.4k indexed citations

About

The 6.9k papers published in Heart Rhythm in the last decades have received a total of 165.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Heart Rhythm usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (6.3k papers), Molecular Biology (835 papers) and Surgery (645 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4.1k papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3.3k papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Heart Rhythm are Charles Antzelevitch, Michael J. Ackerman, Francis E. Marchlinski, Arthur A.M. Wilde, Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, Bruce L. Wilkoff, David J. Callans, David J. Tester, Peng‐Sheng Chen and Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman.

In The Last Decade

Heart Rhythm

6.0k papers receiving 161.0k citations

Countries where authors publish in Heart Rhythm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Heart Rhythm. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Heart Rhythm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heart Rhythm more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Heart Rhythm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Heart Rhythm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Heart Rhythm.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026