Scientia Forestalis

1.1k papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Scientia Forestalis in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Scientia Forestalis usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (317 papers), Plant Science (284 papers) and Forestry (268 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (289 papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (250 papers) and Growth and nutrition in plants (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scientia Forestalis are M.P. Vecchi, Scott Kirkpatrick, Melinda Moeur, John S. Richardson, Peter Schoonmaker, Glen W. Armstrong, John A. Scrivani, Sorin C. Popescu, Randolph H. Wynne and Boris Zeide.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Scientia Forestalis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Scientia Forestalis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scientia Forestalis.

Countries where authors publish in Scientia Forestalis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scientia Forestalis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scientia Forestalis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scientia Forestalis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025