Revue Forestière Française

1.9k papers and 5.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Revue Forestière Française in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Revue Forestière Française usually cover Plant Science (448 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (421 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (319 papers) specifically the topics of Agriculture and Rural Development Research (345 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (306 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (267 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue Forestière Française are Claude Delatour, Gilbert Aussenac, Jean Garbaye, H. POLGE, F. Toutain, Henri Frochot, Michel Ducrey, M. Becker, François Le Tacon and Louis Roussel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revue Forestière Française

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue Forestière Française. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue Forestière Française.

Countries where authors publish in Revue Forestière Française

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue Forestière Française. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue Forestière Française with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue Forestière Française more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025