Countries where authors publish in Scandinavian Audiology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scandinavian Audiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scandinavian Audiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scandinavian Audiology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Scandinavian Audiology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Scandinavian Audiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scandinavian Audiology.
About Scandinavian Audiology
The 1.0k papers published in Scandinavian Audiology in the last decades have received a total of 17.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Scandinavian Audiology usually cover Sensory Systems (342 papers), Speech and Hearing (331 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (664 papers), Otorhinolaryngology (123 papers) and Neurology (145 papers) specifically the topics of Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (614 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (338 papers), Noise Effects and Management (331 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (144 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (129 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (121 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (86 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scandinavian Audiology are C. Elberling, Björn Hagerman, Ulf Rosenhall, A. R. D. Thornton, P. Osterhammel, D. N. Brooks, Agnete Parving, K. Terkildsen, M. Don and Erik Borg.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.