Björn Hagerman

1.9k total citations
30 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Björn Hagerman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Signal Processing. According to data from OpenAlex, Björn Hagerman has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Speech and Hearing and 12 papers in Signal Processing. Recurrent topics in Björn Hagerman's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (23 papers), Noise Effects and Management (13 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (12 papers). Björn Hagerman is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (23 papers), Noise Effects and Management (13 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (12 papers). Björn Hagerman collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Canada and United States. Björn Hagerman's co-authors include Alf Gabrielsson, Bo N. Schenkman, Åke Olofsson, Ulf Rosenhall, Göran Lundberg, Martin Pienkowski, Arne Leijon, K. Karlsson, Tjalfe G. Poulsen and Kim Kähäri and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Björn Hagerman

30 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Björn Hagerman

DEP

Arlene C. Neuman United States

Kirsten C. Wagener Germany

Inga Holube Germany

Jace Wolfe United States

Chaslav V. Pavlovic United States

Anna Warzybok Germany

B. C. J. Moore United Kingdom

Rauna K. Surr United States

Lieselot Van Deun Belgium

Leonard E. Cornelisse Canada

Arlene C. Neuman United States

Björn Hagerman

1.1k ×1.0

653 ×1.0

476 ×1.0

355 ×1.0

139 ×1.3

DEP

Citations per year, relative to Björn Hagerman Björn Hagerman (= 1×) peers Arlene C. Neuman

Countries citing papers authored by Björn Hagerman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Björn Hagerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Björn Hagerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Björn Hagerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Björn Hagerman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Björn Hagerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Björn Hagerman. The network helps show where Björn Hagerman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Björn Hagerman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Björn Hagerman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Björn Hagerman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Björn Hagerman. Björn Hagerman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Rosenhall, Ulf, et al.. (2014). Tinnitus and Other Auditory Problems – Occupational Noise Exposure below Risk Limits May Cause Inner Ear Dysfunction. PLoS ONE. 9(5). e97377–e97377. 17 indexed citations

Hagerman, Björn. (2013). Musicians′ ability to judge the risk of acquiring noise induced hearing loss. Noise and Health. 15(64). 199–199. 4 indexed citations

Rosenhall, Ulf, et al.. (2011). Noise-induced tinnitus: A comparison between four clinical groups without apparent hearing loss. Noise and Health. 13(55). 423–423. 11 indexed citations

Olofsson, Åke, et al.. (2011). The efficacy of N-acetylcysteine to protect the human cochlea from subclinical hearing loss caused by impulse noise: A controlled trial. Noise and Health. 13(55). 392–392. 38 indexed citations

Olofsson, Åke, et al.. (2010). Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: Differences and similarities in binaural performance. International Journal of Audiology. 49(9). 613–627. 23 indexed citations

Pienkowski, Martin & Björn Hagerman. (2009). Auditory intensity discrimination as a function of level-rove and tone duration in normal-hearing and impaired subjects: The “mid-level hump” revisited. Hearing Research. 253(1-2). 107–115. 11 indexed citations

Olofsson, Åke, et al.. (2005). The effect of audibility, signal-to-noise ratio, and temporal speech cues on the benefit from fast-acting compression in modulated noise. International Journal of Audiology. 44(7). 421–433. 6 indexed citations

Poulsen, Tjalfe G. & Björn Hagerman. (2004). A Nordic Round Robin Test on hearing protectors. The influence of the sound field on measured REAT attenuation.. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU). 1 indexed citations

Olofsson, Åke, et al.. (2004). The effect of presentation level and compression characteristics on sentence recognition in modulated noise. International Journal of Audiology. 43(5). 283–294. 12 indexed citations

10.

Hagerman, Björn. (2002). Speech recognition threshold in slightly and fully modulated noise for hearing-impaired subjects: Umbral de reconocimiento del lenguaje para sujetos hipoacúsicos en medio de ruido parcial o completamente modulado. International Journal of Audiology. 41(6). 321–329. 21 indexed citations

11.

Hagerman, Björn, et al.. (2002). Directivity of Different Hearing Aid Microphone Locations: Directividad De Diferentes Posiciones De Los Micrócute;fonos En Los Auxiliares Auditivos. International Journal of Audiology. 41(1). 48–56. 5 indexed citations

12.

Lundberg, Göran, et al.. (1997). Sound Quality Judgement During Acclimatization of Hearing Aid. Scandinavian Audiology. 26(1). 43–51. 15 indexed citations

13.

Hagerman, Björn. (1997). Attempts to Develop an Efficient Speech Test in Fully Modulated Noise. Scandinavian Audiology. 26(2). 93–98. 9 indexed citations

14.

Hagerman, Björn, et al.. (1995). Efficient Adaptive Methods for Measuring Speech Reception Threshold in Quiet and in Noise. Scandinavian Audiology. 24(1). 71–77. 109 indexed citations

15.

Hagerman, Björn. (1993). Efficiency of speech audiometry and other tests. British Journal of Audiology. 27(6). 423–425. 17 indexed citations

16.

Lundberg, Göran, et al.. (1992). Perceived Sound Quality in a Hearing Aid with Vented and Closed Earmould Equalized in Frequency Response. Scandinavian Audiology. 21(2). 87–92. 14 indexed citations

17.

Hagerman, Björn, et al.. (1987). Relations Between Speech Intelligibility and Psychoacoustical Modulation Transfer Function (PMTF). Scandinavian Audiology. 16(3). 121–128. 3 indexed citations

18.

Karlsson, K. & Björn Hagerman. (1984). A Clinical Comparison Between a Laboratory and a Commercial Impedance Audiometer. Scandinavian Audiology. 13(3). 199–203. 3 indexed citations

19.

Hagerman, Björn. (1979). Reliability in the Determination of Speech Reception Threshold (SRT). Scandinavian Audiology. 8(4). 195–202. 16 indexed citations

20.

Hagerman, Björn. (1976). Reliability in the Determination of Speech Discrimination. Scandinavian Audiology. 5(4). 219–228. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact