Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

15.7k citations
1.7k papers · · active since 2017

Impact in

    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Hematology top 5%
    • Hemophilia Treatment and Research
    • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Papers in

    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 332
    • Hemophilia Treatment and Research 271
    • Platelet Disorders and Treatments 200
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms 122

Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

1.3k papers receiving 13.6k citations

Peers

Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Internal Medicine 2.7k
  • Hematology 4.1k
  • Infectious Diseases 855
  • Genetics 338
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 806
Replace Hämostaseologie with:
Hämostaseologie Germany
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis United States
Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology United States
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network United States
Vascular Medicine United States
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology United States
Disease-a-Month United States
Clinical Epidemiology Denmark
Clinics in Chest Medicine United States
Scottish Medical Journal United Kingdom
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis relative to Hämostaseologie Germany Hämostaseologie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Hämostaseologie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

About Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

The 1.7k papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis in the last decades have received a total of 15.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis usually cover Internal Medicine (332 papers), Hematology (602 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (96 papers), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (14 papers) and Genetics (28 papers) specifically the topics of Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (332 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (271 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (200 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (122 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (72 papers), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (48 papers), Complement system in diseases (44 papers) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis are Silvio Antoniak, Cihan Ay, Alisa S. Wolberg, Ingrid Pabinger, Mary Cushman, Marlien Pieters, Florian Moik, Stephan Nopp, Ton Lisman and Nigel Mackman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact