Revue internationale de philosophie

459 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 459 papers published in Revue internationale de philosophie in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Revue internationale de philosophie usually cover Philosophy (165 papers), Sociology and Political Science (94 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (53 papers) specifically the topics of Discourse Analysis and Argumentation Studies (28 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (27 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue internationale de philosophie are Michael Tye, Roberto Poli, Chaïm Perelman, Frank Jackson, Robert Pargetter, Richard J. Arneson, C. Kenneth Waters, John Collier, Dietmar Zaefferer and Christopher Peacocke.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revue internationale de philosophie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue internationale de philosophie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue internationale de philosophie.

Countries where authors publish in Revue internationale de philosophie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue internationale de philosophie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue internationale de philosophie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue internationale de philosophie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025