Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

25.2k citations
418 papers · indexed · active since 1950

Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

390 papers receiving 23.4k citations

Peers

Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
  • Biochemistry 3.6k
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 4.4k
  • Pharmacology 3.3k
  • Food Science 5.0k
  • Drug Discovery 41
Replace Advances in food and nutrition research with:
Advances in food and nutrition research United States
Research Journal of Medicinal Plant Nigeria
Advances in Pharmacological Sciences India
Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine United States
Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants India
Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine India
International Journal of PharmTech Research India
Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology India
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Biomembranes United States
Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology United States
Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review relative to Advances in food and nutrition research United States Advances in food and nutrition research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.0×
Advances in food and nutrition research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review.

About Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

The 418 papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review in the last decades have received a total of 25.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review usually cover Drug Discovery (3 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (104 papers) and Pharmacology (67 papers) specifically the topics of Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (77 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (73 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (52 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (38 papers), Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (37 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (30 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (25 papers) and Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review are Aishwarya Patil, Neelam Chandra, Anita Phatak, Vijaya Lobo, Subramani Parasuraman, Katrin Sak, S Hemalatha, Sunil Kumar, Tasiu Isah and Farhath Khanum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026