International Review of the Red Cross

1.1k papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in International Review of the Red Cross in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in International Review of the Red Cross usually cover Political Science and International Relations (716 papers), Sociology and Political Science (459 papers) and History (162 papers) specifically the topics of International Law and Human Rights (483 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (445 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (153 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Review of the Red Cross are Peter Asaro, Elisabeth Jean Wood, Elizabeth Ferris, Louise Doswald-Beck, Sylvain Vité, Cordula Droege, Noel Sharkey, Jelena Pejić, Jean‐Marie Henckaerts and Patrick Meier.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Review of the Red Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Review of the Red Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Review of the Red Cross.

Countries where authors publish in International Review of the Red Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Review of the Red Cross. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Review of the Red Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Review of the Red Cross more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025