Arboricultural Journal

797 papers and 5.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 797 papers published in Arboricultural Journal in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Arboricultural Journal usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (277 papers), Plant Science (275 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (163 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (193 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (143 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arboricultural Journal are C. Mattheck, C.Y. Jim, Mark Johnston, Ian D. Rotherham, Francis W. M. R. Schwarze, John R. Packham, A. D. Bradshaw, K. Bethge, David Lonsdale and Glynn Percival.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Arboricultural Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arboricultural Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arboricultural Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Arboricultural Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arboricultural Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arboricultural Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arboricultural Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025