Arboricultural Journal

814 papers and 5.3k indexed citations

About

The 814 papers published in Arboricultural Journal in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Arboricultural Journal usually cover Plant Science (283 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (280 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (169 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (196 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (145 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arboricultural Journal are C. Mattheck, C.Y. Jim, Mark Johnston, Ian D. Rotherham, Francis W. M. R. Schwarze, John R. Packham, A. D. Bradshaw, K. Bethge, David Lonsdale and Glynn Percival.

In The Last Decade

Arboricultural Journal

598 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Arboricultural Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arboricultural Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arboricultural Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Arboricultural Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arboricultural Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arboricultural Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arboricultural Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026