Replace American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports with:
American Journal of Ophthalmology Case ReportsUnited States
Arquivos Brasileiros de OftalmologiaBrazil
Korean Journal of OphthalmologySouth Korea
Ophthalmology RetinaUnited States
International Journal of OphthalmologyChina
Seminars in OphthalmologyUnited States
Ophthalmic GeneticsUnited States
Canadian Journal of OphthalmologyCanada
The Ocular SurfaceUnited States
Translational Vision Science & TechnologyUnited States
American Journal of Ophthalmology Case ReportsUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Retinal Cases & Brief Reports
Retinal Cases & Brief Reports · 1×
×0.85.5kOPHTH
×0.92.5kRNMI
×0.6971MB
×0.81.0kNEURO
×1.4828EPIDE
Citations per year, relative to Retinal Cases & Brief Reports
Retinal Cases & Brief Reports · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Retinal Cases & Brief Reports
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Retinal Cases & Brief Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Retinal Cases & Brief Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Retinal Cases & Brief Reports more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Retinal Cases & Brief Reports
This network shows the impact of papers published in Retinal Cases & Brief Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Retinal Cases & Brief Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.