Korean Journal of Ophthalmology

1.6k papers and 16.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 16.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (1.1k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (756 papers) and Epidemiology (251 papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (564 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (418 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (334 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology are Man Soo Kim, Won Ryang Wee, Mee Kum Kim, Jin Hak Lee, Kyung Chul Yoon, Yang Kyeung Cho, Young Suk Yu, Se Joon Woo, Shwu‐Jiuan Sheu and Hyeong Gon Yu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korean Journal of Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025