Ophthalmic Genetics

1.6k papers and 16.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Ophthalmic Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 16.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Ophthalmic Genetics usually cover Molecular Biology (959 papers), Ophthalmology (801 papers) and Genetics (394 papers) specifically the topics of Retinal Development and Disorders (566 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (471 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (241 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ophthalmic Genetics are Elias I. Traboulsi, Robert K. Koenekoop, Francis L. Munier, Sten Andréasson, Morton F. Goldberg, Razek Georges Coussa, Stephen H. Tsang, Judy Savige, Arif O. Khan and Gerald A. Fishman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ophthalmic Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ophthalmic Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ophthalmic Genetics.

Countries where authors publish in Ophthalmic Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ophthalmic Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ophthalmic Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophthalmic Genetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025