Kindheit und Entwicklung

705 papers and 6.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 705 papers published in Kindheit und Entwicklung in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Kindheit und Entwicklung usually cover Clinical Psychology (461 papers), Education (156 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (138 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (344 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (78 papers) and Infant Health and Development (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Kindheit und Entwicklung are Franz Petermann, Ulrike Petermann, Gerhard Neuhäuser, Ute Koglin, Manfred Döpfner, Marc Schmid, Jörg M. Fegert, Gerd Lehmkuhl, Martin H. Schmidt and Petra Hampel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Kindheit und Entwicklung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Kindheit und Entwicklung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Kindheit und Entwicklung.

Countries where authors publish in Kindheit und Entwicklung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Kindheit und Entwicklung. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Kindheit und Entwicklung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kindheit und Entwicklung more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025