The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

5.8k citations
203 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Finance top 5%
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Accounting top 5%
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance

Papers in

    • Corporate Finance and Governance 108
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 28
    • Private Equity and Venture Capital 18
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 70
    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 33
    • Credit Risk and Financial Regulations 14

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

173 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Finance 2.6k
  • Accounting 3.0k
  • Economics and Econometrics 3.1k
  • Strategy and Management 1.3k
  • Management Information Systems 371
Replace China Finance Review International with:
China Finance Review International China
Review of Behavioral Finance United States
Financial markets and portfolio management Germany
Annual Review of Financial Economics United States
The Journal of Risk United States
Asian Economic Papers South Korea
Annals of Finance United States
Portuguese Economic Journal Portugal
Eurasian economic review : United States
Journal of Economic Policy Reform United States
The Review of Corporate Finance Studies relative to China Finance Review International China China Finance Review International's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
China Finance Review International · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Review of Corporate Finance Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies.

About The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

The 203 papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies usually cover Accounting (138 papers), Finance (114 papers), Economics and Econometrics (93 papers), Strategy and Management (36 papers) and Management Information Systems (10 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (108 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (70 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (33 papers), Housing Market and Economics (29 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (28 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (18 papers), Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (14 papers) and Insurance and Financial Risk Management (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies are Alexander F. Wagner, Stefano Ramelli, Wei Jiang, José María Liberti, Yrjö Koskinen, Mitchell A. Petersen, Shuai Yang, Rui Albuquerque, Chendi Zhang and Viral V. Acharya.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact