Portuguese Economic Journal

248 papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 248 papers published in Portuguese Economic Journal in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Portuguese Economic Journal usually cover Economics and Econometrics (198 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (83 papers) and Finance (48 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (52 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (47 papers) and Economic theories and models (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Portuguese Economic Journal are Stephen R. Bond, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, Olivier Blanchard, Mónica Costa Dias, Richard Blundell, Elias Soukiazis, Sara Proença, António Afonso, Pedro Carneiro and Argentino Pessoa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Portuguese Economic Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Portuguese Economic Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Portuguese Economic Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Portuguese Economic Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Portuguese Economic Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Portuguese Economic Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Portuguese Economic Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025