Annual Review of Financial Economics

291 papers and 13.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 291 papers published in Annual Review of Financial Economics in the last decades have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Financial Economics usually cover Finance (206 papers), Economics and Econometrics (152 papers) and Accounting (114 papers) specifically the topics of Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (115 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (87 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Financial Economics are Alex Edmans, Itay Goldstein, Wei Xiong, David Hirshleifer, Ing-Haw Cheng, Philip L. Bond, Albert J. Menkveld, Martin C. Schmalz, Carola Frydman and Dirk Jenter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Financial Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Financial Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Financial Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Financial Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Financial Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Financial Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Financial Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025