Eurasian Economic Review

289 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 289 papers published in Eurasian Economic Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Eurasian Economic Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (149 papers), Accounting (101 papers) and Strategy and Management (86 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (82 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (75 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Eurasian Economic Review are Keld Laursen, Pierre Mohnen, Bronwyn H. Hall, Marco Vivarelli, Eri Nakamura, Mariacristina Piva, John Day, Rita Rahayu, Pejman Ebrahimi and Peter van der Zwan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Eurasian Economic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Eurasian Economic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Eurasian Economic Review.

Countries where authors publish in Eurasian Economic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Eurasian Economic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Eurasian Economic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eurasian Economic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025