Rationality and Society

679 papers and 15.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 679 papers published in Rationality and Society in the last decades have received a total of 15.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Rationality and Society usually cover Sociology and Political Science (383 papers), Safety Research (223 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (176 papers) specifically the topics of Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (220 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (110 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rationality and Society are John H. Goldthorpe, David Sally, Richard Breen, Ronald S. Burt, Andreas Diekmann, Laurence R. Iannaccone, Peter Preisendörfer, Bruno S. Frey, Cristina Bicchieri and Stephen Knack.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rationality and Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rationality and Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rationality and Society.

Countries where authors publish in Rationality and Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rationality and Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rationality and Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rationality and Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025