Countries where authors publish in Petroleum Geoscience
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Petroleum Geoscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Petroleum Geoscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Petroleum Geoscience more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Petroleum Geoscience
This network shows the impact of papers published in Petroleum Geoscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Petroleum Geoscience.
About Petroleum Geoscience
The 978 papers published in Petroleum Geoscience in the last decades have received a total of 22.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Petroleum Geoscience usually cover Geology (236 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (238 papers), Geophysics (398 papers), Mechanics of Materials (554 papers) and Ocean Engineering (322 papers) specifically the topics of Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (521 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (299 papers), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (234 papers), Geological formations and processes (233 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (191 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (162 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (107 papers) and Geological Studies and Exploration (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Petroleum Geoscience are Andrew Cullen, N. R. Goulty, Duncan S. Macgregor, Richard R. Hillis, D. K. Larue, G. Yielding, T. Manzocchi, Cathy Hollis, John J. Walsh and John R. Underhill.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.