Pulmonary Circulation

1.5k papers and 19.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Pulmonary Circulation in the last decades have received a total of 19.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Pulmonary Circulation usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.3k papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (761 papers) and Genetics (225 papers) specifically the topics of Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (1.2k papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (285 papers) and Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (205 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pulmonary Circulation are Anna R. Hemnes, Kurt R. Stenmark, John Ryan, Margaret R. MacLean, Ryan J. Tedford, Sébastien Bonnet, James West, Naomi C. Chesler, Paul R. Forfia and Joseph Loscalzo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pulmonary Circulation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pulmonary Circulation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pulmonary Circulation.

Countries where authors publish in Pulmonary Circulation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pulmonary Circulation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pulmonary Circulation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pulmonary Circulation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025