Nephron Clinical Practice

1.2k papers and 32.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Nephron Clinical Practice in the last decades have received a total of 32.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Nephron Clinical Practice usually cover Nephrology (765 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (234 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (202 papers) specifically the topics of Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (448 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (246 papers) and Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nephron Clinical Practice are Arif Khwaja, Friedo W. Dekker, Carmine Zoccali, Kitty J. Jager, Andrew Davenport, Andrew S. Bomback, Charles Tomson, Ken Farrington, Claudio Ronco and David Ansell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nephron Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nephron Clinical Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nephron Clinical Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Nephron Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nephron Clinical Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nephron Clinical Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nephron Clinical Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025