Psychotherapy Research

1.9k papers and 51.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Psychotherapy Research in the last decades have received a total of 51.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychotherapy Research usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.6k papers), Social Psychology (741 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (433 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1.2k papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (418 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (347 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychotherapy Research are David L. Morgan, Irving B. Weiner, Robert Elliott, Michael J. Lambert, Leslie S. Greenberg, Robert L. Hatcher, Jacques P. Barber, William B. Stiles, Alan E. Kazdin and J. Arthur Gillaspy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychotherapy Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychotherapy Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychotherapy Research.

Countries where authors publish in Psychotherapy Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychotherapy Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychotherapy Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychotherapy Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025