Countries where authors publish in Biomedical Microdevices
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedical Microdevices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedical Microdevices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedical Microdevices more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Biomedical Microdevices
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedical Microdevices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedical Microdevices.
About Biomedical Microdevices
The 1.9k papers published in Biomedical Microdevices in the last decades have received a total of 58.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Biomedical Microdevices usually cover Biomedical Engineering (1.4k papers), Bioengineering (89 papers), Pharmaceutical Science (88 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (243 papers) and Biomaterials (121 papers) specifically the topics of Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (592 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (584 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (475 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (303 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (215 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (171 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (107 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedical Microdevices are Shuvo Roy, Aaron J. Fleischman, Álvaro Mata, Sangeeta N. Bhatia, Rashid Bashir, Jong Hwan Sung, Karen C. Cheung, Sylvain Martel, Gwo‐Bin Lee and Luke P. Lee.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.