Biomedical Microdevices

1.9k papers and 54.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Biomedical Microdevices in the last decades have received a total of 54.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Biomedical Microdevices usually cover Biomedical Engineering (1.4k papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (332 papers) and Molecular Biology (304 papers) specifically the topics of Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (588 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (581 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (472 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedical Microdevices are Shuvo Roy, Aaron J. Fleischman, Álvaro Mata, Sangeeta N. Bhatia, Rashid Bashir, Jong Hwan Sung, Karen C. Cheung, Gwo‐Bin Lee, Sylvain Martel and Luke P. Lee.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biomedical Microdevices

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedical Microdevices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedical Microdevices.

Countries where authors publish in Biomedical Microdevices

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedical Microdevices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedical Microdevices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedical Microdevices more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025