Clinical Case Studies

5.3k citations
680 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Family and Disability Support Research
    • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
    • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
    • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

Papers in

    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 178
    • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 83
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 74
    • Eating Disorders and Behaviors 69
    • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 65

Clinical Case Studies

631 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Clinical Case Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Clinical Psychology 3.2k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.0k
  • Applied Psychology 320
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 755
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
Replace The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health with:
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health United States
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Italy
Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo) Brazil
Journal of Holistic Nursing United States
Evidence-Based Mental Health United Kingdom
Behaviour Change Australia
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Brazil
Journal of Phenomenological Psychology United States
Canadian Journal of School Psychology Canada
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology Spain
Clinical Case Studies relative to The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health United States The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.9×
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Case Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Case Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Case Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Case Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical Case Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Case Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Case Studies.

About Clinical Case Studies

The 680 papers published in Clinical Case Studies in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Case Studies usually cover Clinical Psychology (536 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (169 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 papers), Applied Psychology (39 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (154 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (178 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (117 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (115 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (83 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (74 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (69 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (68 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Case Studies are Thomas H. Dozier, Kathleen Armstrong, Joanne L. Davis, Derek R. Hopko, Eva R. Kimonis, Lisa DeMarni Cromer, Rachael M. Swopes, Rochelle F. Hanson, Cameo Borntrager and Steven C. Hayes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact