Proteome Science

698 papers and 15.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 698 papers published in Proteome Science in the last decades have received a total of 15.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Proteome Science usually cover Molecular Biology (441 papers), Spectroscopy (180 papers) and Plant Science (65 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (172 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (80 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Proteome Science are Karlheinz Mann, Matthias Mann, François Chevalier, Albert J. Poustka, Lambert Ngoka, Susan B. Altenbach, Charlene K. Tanaka, William H. Vensel, Éric Chevet and William J. Hurkman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Proteome Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Proteome Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Proteome Science.

Countries where authors publish in Proteome Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Proteome Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Proteome Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proteome Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025