Algebra Universalis

2.5k papers and 16.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Algebra Universalis in the last decades have received a total of 16.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Algebra Universalis usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (2.0k papers), Algebra and Number Theory (831 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (550 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Algebra and Logic (1.8k papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (614 papers) and Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (570 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Algebra Universalis are Ralph McKenzie, Walter Taylor, Don Pigozzi, Richard P. Stanley, W. J. Blok, Aldo Ursini, Gábor Czédli, Alan Day, Brian Davey and Stanley Burris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Algebra Universalis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Algebra Universalis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Algebra Universalis.

Countries where authors publish in Algebra Universalis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Algebra Universalis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Algebra Universalis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Algebra Universalis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025