npj Precision Oncology

752 papers and 11.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 752 papers published in npj Precision Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations. Papers published in npj Precision Oncology usually cover Oncology (361 papers), Molecular Biology (310 papers) and Cancer Research (264 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (188 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (122 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in npj Precision Oncology are Marina K. Holz, Adi Y. Berman, Francisco Azuaje, Hongyang Wang, Toshikazu Ushijima, Hideyuki Takeshima, Ann M. Bode, David A. Ahlquist, Ling Yan and Le–Xing Yu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in npj Precision Oncology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in npj Precision Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in npj Precision Oncology.

Countries where authors publish in npj Precision Oncology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in npj Precision Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in npj Precision Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites npj Precision Oncology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025