Countries where authors publish in Plant protection quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant protection quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant protection quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant protection quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Plant protection quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant protection quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant protection quarterly.
About Plant protection quarterly
The 506 papers published in Plant protection quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Plant protection quarterly usually cover Insect Science (265 papers), Plant Science (285 papers) and Forestry (20 papers) specifically the topics of Biological Control of Invasive Species (213 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (80 papers) and Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant protection quarterly are John Busby, F. D. Panetta, Roger Cousens, Paul Downey, Rachel McFadyen, D. T. Briese, George N. Batianoff, Don Butler, J. M. B. Smith and J. K. Scott.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.