Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel McFadyen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel McFadyen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel McFadyen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel McFadyen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel McFadyen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel McFadyen. The network helps show where Rachel McFadyen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel McFadyen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel McFadyen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel McFadyen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel McFadyen. Rachel McFadyen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McFadyen, Rachel. (2011). BENEFITS FROM BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WEEDS IN AUSTRALIA. JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH. 18. 283–290.1 indexed citations
3.
Sindel, B. M., et al.. (2008). The continuing spread of fireweed (Senecio madagascariensis) - the hottest of topics.. RUNE (Research UNE). 47–49.8 indexed citations
4.
McFadyen, Rachel, Seth Lloyd, Christopher Preston, J. H. Watts, & N. D. Crossman. (2006). Bumblebees: implications of a new super-pollinator in mainland Australia.. 227–230.1 indexed citations
Navie, S. C., Rachel McFadyen, F. D. Panetta, & S. W. Adkins. (2005). The effect of CO2 enrichment of the growth of a C3 weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) and its competitive interaction with a C4 grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.). Plant protection quarterly. 20(2). 61–66.24 indexed citations
Strathie, L. W., C. Zachariades, Michael Day, & Rachel McFadyen. (2004). Insects for the biological control of Chromolaena odorata: surveys in the northern Caribbean and efforts undertaken in South Africa.. Technical reports. 45–52.8 indexed citations
9.
McFadyen, Rachel, B. M. Sindel, & S. B. Johnson. (2004). Biological control: managing risks or strangling progress?. 78–81.5 indexed citations
Navie, S. C., Rachel McFadyen, F. D. Panetta, & S. W. Adkins. (1996). The biology of Australian weeds. 27. Parthenium hysterophorus L.. Plant protection quarterly. 11(2). 76–88.148 indexed citations
16.
McFadyen, Rachel, et al.. (1990). Distribution and control of rubber vine, Cryptostegia grandiflora, a major weed in northern Queensland.. Plant protection quarterly. 5(4). 152–155.25 indexed citations
17.
McFadyen, Rachel. (1990). Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata) - how to stop it before it reaches us.. 434–435.1 indexed citations
18.
Hosking, J. R., Rachel McFadyen, & Neil Murray. (1988). Distribution and biological control of cactus species in eastern Australia.. Plant protection quarterly. 3(3). 115–123.33 indexed citations
19.
Auld, B. A., J. R. Hosking, & Rachel McFadyen. (1982). Analysis of the spread of tiger pear and parthenium weed in Australia.. 2(2). 56–60.61 indexed citations
20.
Zimmermann, H. G., et al.. (1979). Annotated list of some cactus-feeding insects of South America.. 33(2). 101–112.34 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.