Advances in Physiotherapy

316 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 316 papers published in Advances in Physiotherapy in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Advances in Physiotherapy usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (95 papers), Pharmacology (80 papers) and Occupational Therapy (47 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (80 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (54 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Physiotherapy are Charlotte Ekdahl, Eline Thornquist, Ylva Nilsagård, Marie Donaghy, Lars Hansson, Amanda Lundvik Gyllensten, Eva Mattsson, Ari Heinonen, Anne Elisabeth Ljunggren and Johan Kvalvik Stanghelle.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Advances in Physiotherapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Physiotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Physiotherapy.

Countries where authors publish in Advances in Physiotherapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Physiotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Physiotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Physiotherapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025