Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

2.8k citations
400 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

338 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Rehabilitation 588
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 208
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 610
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 324
  • Occupational Therapy 145
Replace Rehabilitation Research and Practice with:
Rehabilitation Research and Practice United States
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies United States
Advances in Physiotherapy Sweden
Gender Medicine United States
Current Aging Science United States
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research United States
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism United States
˜The œAmerican journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy United States
Evidence-Based Mental Health United Kingdom
International journal of osteopathic medicine United Kingdom
Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine relative to Rehabilitation Research and Practice United States Rehabilitation Research and Practice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rehabilitation Research and Practice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.

About Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

The 400 papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine usually cover Rehabilitation (68 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (54 papers), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (22 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (75 papers) and Pharmacology (53 papers) specifically the topics of Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (60 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (57 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (45 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (30 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (22 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (22 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (22 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine are Leeanne M. Carey, Lorie Richards, Virgil Mathiowetz, Dennis C. Turk, J. Mizrahi, Akiko Okifuji, Eric Y. Chang, David Yu, John Chae and Lauro S. Halstead.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact