Philosophia Christi

495 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 495 papers published in Philosophia Christi in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophia Christi usually cover Philosophy (156 papers), Sociology and Political Science (49 papers) and Religious studies (46 papers) specifically the topics of Theology and Philosophy of Evil (110 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (33 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophia Christi are David M. Ciocchi, Stephen T. Davis, Andrew Gustafson, William Lane Craig, Charles Taliaferro, Arthur F. Holmes, Trent Dougherty, Alvin Plantinga, A. John Spencer and Stewart Goetz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophia Christi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophia Christi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophia Christi.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophia Christi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophia Christi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophia Christi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophia Christi more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025