Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology

408 papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 408 papers published in Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology usually cover Pharmaceutical Science (171 papers), Biomaterials (98 papers) and Molecular Biology (88 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (113 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (91 papers) and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology are Emmanuel O. Akala, Funmilola A. Fisusi, Mahesh Kumar, Kaisar Raza, Khaled Greish, Akhilesh Chandra, Naser Mohammadpour Dounighi, Mohsen Mehrabi, Mohsen Mohammadi and Geeta Aggarwal.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025