Dissolution Technologies

540 papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 540 papers published in Dissolution Technologies in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Dissolution Technologies usually cover Pharmaceutical Science (267 papers), Materials Chemistry (134 papers) and Analytical Chemistry (116 papers) specifically the topics of Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (253 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (133 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dissolution Technologies are Margareth Marques, May Almukainzi, Raimar Löebenberg, Jennifer Dressman, Sandra Klein, Nikoletta Fotaki, Jayvadan K. Patel, Vinod P. Shah, Kailas Thakker and Gowthamarajan Kuppusamy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Dissolution Technologies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Dissolution Technologies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dissolution Technologies.

Countries where authors publish in Dissolution Technologies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dissolution Technologies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dissolution Technologies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dissolution Technologies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025