This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Partner Abuse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Partner Abuse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Partner Abuse more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Partner Abuse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Partner Abuse.
About Partner Abuse
The 342 papers published in Partner Abuse in the last decades have received a total of 6.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Partner Abuse usually cover Health (300 papers), Gender Studies (127 papers) and Clinical Psychology (117 papers) specifically the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (300 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (116 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (82 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (65 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (56 papers), Sex work and related issues (42 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (36 papers) and Marriage and Sexual Relationships (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Partner Abuse are Deborah M. Capaldi, Joann Wu Shortt, Hyoun K. Kim, Naomi B. Knoble, Jennifer Langhinrichsen‐Rohling, Tiffany A. Misra, Clare Cannon, Denise A. Hines, Emily M. Douglas and Christopher M. Murphy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.